Your mentors rely on intuition? Supervision turns experience into methodology — with measurable mentoring quality
60% of project mentors in universities rely on intuition. Supervision: case review, approach correction, mentor retention. Group and individual formats.
Supervision helps mentors see their own patterns, adjust their approach, and receive professional support instead of burning out.
Book a trainingNot mentoring theory, but analysis of situations happening right now with your mentors
Group supervision (5–8 people) for experience sharing. Individual — for complex cases and personal development
Mentors receiving supervision stay 2x longer. They see their growth and feel supported
Mentoring assessment criteria, 360-degree feedback, satisfaction metrics — data instead of guesswork
60% of project mentors in Russian universities have no formal training (HSE data). They mentor as best they can — by intuition, by analogy with their own experience. Without feedback, they can't see what works and what harms.
Mentoring is volunteer or low-paid work. Without professional support, mentors burn out in 1–2 semesters. The university spends resources finding new ones — and the cycle repeats.
One mentor hand-holds the student, another throws them into deep water. No unified standards, no assessment tools. Project outcomes depend on luck with the mentor.
Project mentor supervision is regular professional support for active mentors in educational organizations. According to HSE data, 60% of project mentors in Russian universities have no formal training and work based on personal experience and intuition. Supervision turns this fragmented experience into a system: mentors analyze real cases, receive expert feedback, and learn tools they can apply at their very next mentee meeting.
The key effect is mentor retention. Mentors receiving regular supervision stay in the program 2x longer because they see their professional growth and feel supported.
Mentors are faculty or alumni without training. Mentoring quality depends on personality, not the system
SolutionSystematic supervision: unified standards, case analysis, measurable mentoring quality
I recruit new mentors every semester — old ones burn out and leave. Training new ones takes a month
SolutionRetention through professional growth: supervision, community, certification
I'm not sure I'm guiding the student correctly. No feedback, no one to discuss difficult cases with
SolutionRegular supervision: analysis of your cases, expert feedback, peer community
Assess current mentoring state: who the mentors are, what problems exist, what expectations
Form groups (5–8 mentors), set meeting frequency, establish ground rules
Group supervision every 2–3 weeks. Case analysis, feedback, tools
Measure metrics: satisfaction, project quality, mentor retention. Report for administration
Prices are indicative. Final cost confirmed in contract.
Designing the activity sequence: from problem statement to defense. Unified logic for all mentors. For universities and accelerators.
PBL consulting for universities: curriculum audit, faculty facilitation training, project assessment rubrics. Founder's track record: 75+ universities via University 20.35. Results in 1 semester.
88% say feedback matters, but 57% don't get honest feedback. Training with role-plays: SBI, feedforward, BOFF. 3 hours of practice on your real situations.